Repurposing the Fibrosis-4 Score in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Data from the ESPOIR Cohort.

Background: We aimed to evaluate the value of the Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) score as a prognostic factor in RA in the prospective ESPOIR cohort. Methods: We included patients from the ESPOIR cohort with a diagnosis of RA according to ACR/EULAR criteria. The formula for the FIB-4 score is as follows: [age (years) × aspartate transaminase level (U/L)]/[platelet count (109/L) × alanine aminotransferase level (U/L)1/2]. We used a linear mixed-effects model with a random effect of patient to account for repeated measures over time. Results: Overall, 647 of the 813 patients included met the ACR/EULAR criteria for RA, with no differential diagnosis during the first 10 years of follow-up. Of these patients, at baseline, 633 had a calculable FIB-4 score. Median FIB-4 score was 0.75 (interquartile range 0.53-0.99). On multivariate analysis, FIB-4 score was not independently associated with progression of Disease Activity Score in 28 joints over 10 years of follow-up, unlike baseline C-reactive protein level and SJC. Baseline FIB-4 score was not associated with the modified Sharp score at 5-year follow-up, unlike age and ACPAs. FIB-4 score was not associated with mortality (hazard ratio 1.1 [95% CI 0.46; 2.8], p = 0.77) or major adverse cardiovascular events (0.46 [0.13; 1.6], p = 0.22) over the 10-year follow-up. No significant change in FIB-4 score over time was related to treatments. Conclusions: The present prospective cohort study did not find a prognostic role of FIB-4 score in RA. Reassuringly, FIB-4 score was not increased with DMARD treatment after 10 years of follow-up.

History of pre-eclampsia does not appear to be a risk factor for vascular phenotype in women with systemic sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Vascular phenotype is associated with a poor prognosis in systemic sclerosis (SSc). The identification of its risk factors could facilitate its early detection. OBJECTIVES: To explore risk factors for a vascular phenotype of SSc, among them a history of pre-eclampsia. METHODS: This observational multicentre case-control study enrolled adult women fulfilling European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology 2013 diagnosis criteria for SSc and having a pregnancy history≥6 months before SSc diagnosis in 14 French hospital-based recruiting centres from July 2020 to July 2022. Cases had specific vascular complications of SSc defined as history of digital ischaemic ulcers, pulmonary arterial hypertension, specific cardiac involvement or renal crisis. Women with SSc were included during their annual follow-up visit and filled in a self-administered questionnaire about pregnancy. A case report form was completed by their physician, reporting data on medical history, physical examination, clinical investigations and current medication. The main outcome was the presence/absence of a personal history of pre-eclampsia before SSc diagnosis, according to the validated pre-eclampsia questionnaire. RESULTS: 378 women were included: 129 cases with a vascular phenotype and 249 matched controls. A history of pre-eclampsia was reported in 5 (3.9%) cases and 12 (4.8%) controls and was not associated with a vascular phenotype (OR=0.96, 95% CI 0.28 to 3.34, p=0.9). Besides, Rodnan skin score and disease duration≥5 years were risk factors for vascular phenotype. CONCLUSIONS: In women with SSc and a pregnancy history≥6 months before SSc, a history of pre-eclampsia is not associated with a vascular phenotype.

Does the Impact of COVID-19 on Patients With Systemic Sclerosis Change Over Time?

OBJECTIVE: The outcome of patients with COVID-19 improved over the pandemic, including patients with systemic rheumatic diseases. However, data on patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) are lacking. This study aimed to assess the outcome of patients with both SSc and COVID-19 over several waves. METHODS: Patients with both SSc and COVID-19 who were registered in the European Scleroderma Trials and Research group (EUSTAR) were collected between April 2020 and April 2021. Patients were assigned to waves 1, 2, or 3 depending on the date of their COVID-19 diagnosis. Primary endpoints were death, intensive care unit stay, or ventilatory support (severe outcome). Subgroup analyses of patients who were hospitalized or died were conducted. General and SSc-specific characteristics and treatment were compared over the waves. Descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regression were applied. RESULTS: A total of 333 patients were included; 57 patients (17%) had a severe outcome, and 30 patients (9%) died. Compared to wave 1, significantly fewer patients with SSc suffered from severe COVID-19 in waves 2 and 3 (28.2% vs 9.8% and 12.7%; P < 0.001), fewer patients required hospitalization (46.7% vs 19.6% and 25.5%; P < 0.001) or ventilatory support (24.0% vs 8.7% and 10.9%; P = 0.001), and fewer patients died (15.7% vs 5.0% and 7.5%; P = 0.011). Patients were significantly younger, more often men, had less frequent arterial hypertension, and less SSc cardiac involvement over waves 1 to 3. Patients received significantly less medium to high doses of corticosteroids as they did SSc treatment. CONCLUSION: The outcome of patients with both SSc and COVID-19 improved significantly over time because of intrinsic and extrinsic factors.

Heart and systemic sclerosis-findings from a national cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: Heart involvement is one of the leading causes of death in systemic sclerosis (SSc). The prevalence of SSc-related cardiac involvement is poorly known. Our objective was to investigate the prevalence and prognosis burden of different heart diseases in a nationwide cohort of patients with SSc. METHODS: We used data from a multicentric prospective study using the French SSc national database. Focusing on SSc-related cardiac involvement, we aimed to determine its incidence and risk factors. RESULTS: Over the 3528 patients with SSc 312 (10.9%) had SSc-related cardiac involvement at baseline. They tended to have a diffuse SSc subtype more frequently, more severe clinical features, and presented more cardiovascular risk factors. From the 1646 patients available for follow-up analysis, SSc-related cardiac involvement was associated with an increased risk of death. There was no significant difference in overall survival between SSc-related cardiac involvement, ischaemic heart disease or pulmonary arterial hypertension. Regarding survival analysis, 98 patients developed SSc-related cardiac involvement at five years (5-year event rate: 11.15%). Regarding reduced LVEF < 50% and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction, the 5-year event rate was 2.49% and 5.84% respectively. Pericarditis cumulative incidence at five years was 3%. Diffuse SSc subtype was a risk factor for SSc-related cardiac involvement and pericarditis. Female sex was associated with less left ventricular diastolic dysfunction incidence. CONCLUSIONS: Our results describe the incidence and prognostic burden of SSc-related cardiac involvement at a large scale, with gender and diffuse SSc subtype as risk factors. Further analyses should assess the potential impact of treatment on these various cardiac outcomes.

Influence of systemic sclerosis on periodontal health: A case-control study.

AIM: Patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) present various clinical and radiological oral manifestations. However, precise evaluation of the oral features associated with diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc) and limited cutaneous SSc (lcSSc) is limited. The objective of this study was to evaluate the periodontal ligament (PDL) surface in SSc patients in comparison with controls. Assessment of oral-health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) and the levels of different biomarkers in the gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) was performed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: SSc patients and matched controls underwent standardized oral examination and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6), chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 4 (CXCL-4) and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) in the GCF were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. PDL surface was measured on CBCT axial views. OHRQoL was quantified using the Mouth Handicap in SSc Scale (MHISS). RESULTS: Thirty-nine SSc patients and 39 controls were included. SSc patients exhibited increased PDL surface, higher number of missing teeth as well as elevated IL-6, MMP-9 and CXCL-4 levels. Reduced mouth opening was observed in dcSSc but not in lcSSc patients. MHISS score was higher in dcSSc than in lcSSc patients. Although worse periodontal parameters were found in both subgroups compared with controls, dcSSc patients presented lower gingival inflammation. CONCLUSIONS: SSc is associated with PDL space widening, impaired oral health and OHRQoL.

Mouth opening in systemic sclerosis: A longitudinal analysis from the French National Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have evaluated mouth opening (MO) in systemic sclerosis (SSc). None have studied MO trajectories. OBJECTIVE: To study MO trajectories in SSc. METHODS: This multicentre study included patients enrolled in the French national SSc cohort with at least one MO assessment, described patients based on MO baseline measure, modeled MO trajectories, and associated MO measures with SSc prognosis. RESULTS: We included 1101 patients. Baseline MO was associated with disease severity. On Kaplan-Meier analysis, MO < 30 mm was associated with worse 30-year-survival (p<0.01) and risk of pulmonary arterial hypertension (p<0.05). Individual MO trajectories were heterogenous among patients. The best model of MO trajectories according to latent-process mixed modeling showed that 88.8% patients had a stable MO trajectory and clustered patients into 3 groups that predicted SSc survival (p<0.05) and interstitial lung disease (ILD) occurrence (p<0.05). The model highlighted a cluster of 9.5% patients with diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc) (p<0.05) and high but decreasing MO over 1 year (p<0.0001) who were at increased risk of poor survival and ILD. CONCLUSION: MO, which is a simple and reliable measure, could be used to predict disease severity and survival in SSc. Although MO remained stable in most SSc patients, dcSSc patients with high but decreasing MO were at risk of poor survival and ILD. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Tolerance and efficacy of targeted therapies prescribed for off-label indications in refractory systemic autoimmune diseases: data of the first 100 patients enrolled in the TATA registry (TArgeted Therapy in Autoimmune Diseases).

OBJECTIVES: To assess the tolerance and efficacy of targeted therapies prescribed off-label in refractory low-prevalence autoimmune and inflammatory systemic diseases. METHODS: The TATA registry (TArgeted Therapy in Autoimmune Diseases) is a prospective, observational, national and independent cohort follow-up. The inclusion criteria in the registry are as follows: age >18 years; low-prevalence autoimmune and inflammatory systemic disease treated with off-label drugs started after 1 January 2019. RESULTS: Hundred (100) patients (79 women) were enrolled. The median age was 52.5 years (95% CI 49 to 56) and the median disease duration before enrolment was 5 years (3 to 7). The targeted therapies at enrolment were as follows: Janus kinase/signal transducers and activators of transcription inhibitors (44%), anti-interleukin (IL)-6R (22%), anti-IL-12/23, anti-IL-23 and anti-IL-17 (9%), anti-B cell activating factor of the tumour necrosis factor family (5%), abatacept (5%), other targeted treatments (9%) and combination of targeted treatments (6%). 73% of patients were receiving corticosteroid therapy at enrolment (median dose 10 mg/day). The current median follow-up time is 9 months (8 to 10).Safety: 11 serious infections (incidence rate of 14.8/100 patient-years) and 1 cancer (1.3 cancers/100 patient-years) were observed. Two patients died from severe COVID-19 (2.7 deaths/100 patient-years).Efficacy: the targeted treatment was considered effective by the clinician in 56% of patients and allowed, in responders, a median reduction of oral corticosteroids of 15 (9 to 21) mg/day, below 7.5 mg/day in 76% of patients, while 28% discontinued. CONCLUSION: These initial results of the TATA registry confirm the diversity of targeted treatments prescribed off-label in refractory autoimmune diseases and their corticosteroid-sparing effect when effective. Tolerance was acceptable in these refractory patients with a long history of treatment with immunosuppressive drugs.

Management and outcome of native joint septic arthritis: a nationwide survey in French rheumatology departments, 2016-2017.

OBJECTIVES: To describe current management and outcome of native joint septic arthritis (NJSA) in French rheumatology departments. METHODS: For this retrospective, nationwide multicentric study, 127 French rheumatology departments were contacted to report up to 12 cases of NJSA that occurred between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2017. Characteristics, diagnosis procedures, therapeutic management and outcome were recorded. RESULTS: Overall, 362 patients were included (mean age 64.0±18.6 years, median Charlson comorbidity index 3.5 (0-14)). Knee was the most frequent site (n=160 (38.9%)), and Staphylococcus sp (n=185 (51.4%)), the most frequent pathogen. All patients received antibiotics for a mean duration of 46.8 (±22.0) days, including intravenous route for a mean of 17.2 (±15.4) days. Management was heterogeneous. Surgical procedure was performed in 171 (48.3%), joint immobilisation in 128 (43.8%). During follow-up, 91 (28.3%) patients have had serious complications and 28 (9.2%) of them died. Factors associated with 1-year mortality were age (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.13; p<0.001), Charlson's index (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.58; p=0.012), presence of bacteraemia (OR 4.02, 95% CI 1.35 to 11.99; p=0.008), antibiotic use in the previous 3 months (OR 3.32, 95% CI 1.11 to 9.87; p=0.029) and Staphylococcus aureus NJSA compared with Streptococcus sp. NJSA (OR 7.24, 95% CI 1.26 to 41.68, p=0.027). The complete recovery with no adverse joint outcome at 1 year was observed in n=125/278 patients (55.0%). CONCLUSION: Prognosis of NJSA remained severe with a high rate of morbimortality. Its management was very heterogeneous. This study highlights the importance of the new French recommendations, published after the completion of the study, in order to facilitate NJSA management.

Patient preferences for the treatment of systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease: a discrete choice experiment.

OBJECTIVES: Treatments for SSc-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) differ in attributes, i.e. mode of administration, adverse events (AEs) and efficacy. As physicians and patients may perceive treatments differently, shared decision-making can be essential for optimal treatment provision. We therefore aimed to quantify patient preferences for different treatment attributes. METHODS: Seven SSc-ILD attributes were identified from mixed-methods research and clinician input: mode of administration, shortness of breath, skin tightness, cough, tiredness, risk of gastrointestinal AEs (GI-AEs) and risk of serious and non-serious infections. Patients with SSc-ILD completed an online discrete choice experiment (DCE) in which they were asked to repeatedly choose between two alternatives characterized by varying severity levels of the included attributes. The data were analysed using a multinomial logit model; relative attribute importance and maximum acceptable risk measures were calculated. RESULTS: Overall, 231 patients with SSc-ILD completed the DCE. Patients preferred twice-daily oral treatments and 6-12 monthly infusions. Patients' choices were mostly influenced by the risk of GI-AEs or infections. Improvement was more important in respiratory symptoms than in skin tightness. Concerning trade-offs, patients accepted different levels of increase in GI-AE risk: +21% if it reduced the infusions' frequency; +15% if changing to an oral treatment; up to +37% if it improved breathlessness; and up to +36% if it reduced the risk of infections. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to quantitatively elicit patients' preferences for treatment attributes in SSc-ILD. Patients showed willingness to make trade-offs, providing a firm basis for shared decision-making in clinical practice.

Management of nonviral mixed cryoglobulinemia vasculitis refractory to rituximab: Data from a European collaborative study and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Glucocorticoids (GCs) plus rituximab (RTX) represent the first-line treatment of nonviral mixed cryoglobulinemia vasculitis (CryoVas). However, data on therapeutic management and outcome of patients refractory to RTX are lacking. METHODS: We conducted a European collaborative retrospective multicenter study of patients with nonviral mixed CryoVas refractory to RTX and performed a literature review. RESULTS: Twenty-six original cases and 7 additional patients from the literature were included. All patients but one had type 2 cryoglobulinemia, and causes were autoimmune disease (51%), malignant hemopathy (12%) or essential CryoVas (42%). CryoVas was primary refractory to RTX in 42%, while 58% had an initial response to RTX before immune escape. After RTX failure, patients received a median of 1 (IQR, 1-3) line of treatment, representing 65 treatment periods during follow-up. Main treatments used were GCs in 92%, alkylating agents in 43%, RTX in combination with other treatments in 46%, and belimumab in 17%. Combination of anti-CD20 plus belimumab, alkylating agents alone and anti-CD20 plus alkylating agents provided the highest rates of clinical response in 100% 82% and 73%, respectively, but showed poor immunological response, in 50%, 30% and 38%, respectively. Rates of severe infection were 57%, 9% and 0% in patients receiving anti-CD20 plus belimumab, alkylating agents alone and anti-CD20 plus alkylating agents, respectively. CONCLUSION: In patients with nonviral mixed CryoVas refractory to RTX, anti-CD20 plus belimumab, and alkylating agents associated or not with anti-CD20, provide the highest rates of clinical response. However, anti-CD20 plus belimumab was frequently associated with severe infections.

Significance of Sjögren's syndrome and anti-cN1A antibody in myositis patients.

OBJECTIVE: We recently recorded a high prevalence of inclusion body myositis (IBM) in patients with Sjögren's syndrome (SS). Whether myositis patients with SS differ from myositis patients without SS in terms of the characteristics of the myositis is currently unknown. Anti-cytosolic 5'-nucleotidase 1 A (cN1A) has recently been proposed as a biomarker for IBM but is also frequent in SS. Whether anti-cN1A is independently associated with IBM is still an open question. We aimed to assess the significance of SS and anti-cN1A in myositis patients. METHODS: Cumulative data on all myositis patients (EULAR/ACR 2017 criteria) screened for SS (ACR/EULAR 2016 criteria) in a single centre were analysed. Ninety-nine patients were included, covering the whole spectrum of EULAR/ACR 2017 myositis subgroups and with a median follow-up of 6 years (range 1.0-37.5). The 34 myositis patients with SS (myositis/SS+) were compared with the 65 myositis patients without SS (myositis/SS-). RESULTS: . IBM was present in 24% of the myositis/SS+ patients vs 6% of the myositis/SS- group (P = 0.020). None of the IBM patients responded to treatment, whether they had SS or not. Anti-cN1A was more frequent in myositis/SS+ patients (38% vs 6%, P = 0.0005), independently of the higher prevalence of IBM in this group (multivariate P value: 0.02). Anti-cN1A antibody specificity for IBM was 0.96 (95% CI: 0.87, 0.99) in the myositis/SS- group but dropped to 0.70 (95% CI: 0.48, 0.85) in the myositis/SS+ group. INTERPRETATION: In myositis patients, SS is associated with IBM and with anti-cN1A antibodies, independently of the IBM diagnosis. As a consequence, anti-cN1A has limited specificity for IBM in myositis patients with SS.

Safety and preliminary efficacy of allogeneic bone marrow-derived multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells for systemic sclerosis: a single-centre, open-label, dose-escalation, proof-of-concept, phase 1/2 study.

BACKGROUND: Systemic sclerosis remains an orphan life-threatening autoimmune disease. The unique immunomodulatory, proangiogenic, and antifibrotic properties of mesenchymal stromal cells provide a strong rationale for mesenchymal stromal cell-based therapy for systemic sclerosis, and treatment with mesenchymal stromal cells has shown benefits in preclinical models of this disease. The safety of allogeneic bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cell administration in patients with severe systemic sclerosis has not yet been established. We aimed to test the safety and feasibility of a single intravenous injection of intrafamilial allogeneic bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells to treat severe diffuse systemic sclerosis. METHODS: We did an open-label, dose-escalation, proof-of-concept, phase 1/2 study at Saint-Louis-Hospital, Paris, France. Eligible patients were aged 18-70 years with severe diffuse systemic sclerosis, who fulfilled the 2013 American College of Rheumatology and European League Against Rheumatism systemic sclerosis criteria, had a minimum modified Rodnan skin score of 15 (range 0-51), had severe lung, heart, or kidney involvement, and had inadequate response or contraindications to conventional immunosuppressive therapy or autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Patients with severe comorbidities were excluded. The first ten recipients were to receive a single intravenous infusion of 1 × 106 bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells per kg bodyweight, and the subsequent ten recipients were to be infused with a single dose of 3 × 106 bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells per kg bodyweight. The primary endpoint was immediate tolerance during infusion and within the first 10 days after infusion, measured as the occurrence of serious adverse events (grade 3 or higher) in all infused patients. Safety was assessed in all participants during the 24-month follow-up period. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02213705. FINDINGS: Between March 24, 2014, and Jan 6, 2020, 20 cisgender individuals (13 women and seven men) with severe diffuse systemic sclerosis were enrolled. All 20 patients were included in the primary outcome analysis. No infusion-related severe adverse events and three infusion-related adverse events occurred in the first 10 days after treatment; one patient had grade 1 flushing and another patient had grade 1 nausea and grade 2 asthenia. After ten days and up to a median follow-up of 24·1 months (IQR 20·8-24·5), 36 non-treatment-related severe adverse events in 14 (70%) patients and no treatment-related adverse event were reported. INTERPRETATION: A single infusion of allogeneic bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells was safe in patients with severe diffuse systemic sclerosis. Future placebo-controlled trials will help to definitively ascertain the efficacy of mesenchymal stromal cell-based cell therapy from various tissue sources in larger number of patients with systemic sclerosis. FUNDING: French Ministry of Health, Capucine Association, Fonds de Dotation de l'AFER pour la Recherche Médicale, and Agence Nationale de la Recherche (Infrastructure Program Ecell), France.

Refining "Long-COVID" by a Prospective Multimodal Evaluation of Patients with Long-Term Symptoms Attributed to SARS-CoV-2 Infection.

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 long-haulers, also decribed as having "long-COVID" or post-acute COVID-19 syndrome, represent 10% of COVID-19 patients and remain understudied. METHODS: In this prospective study, we recruited 30 consecutive patients seeking medical help for persistent symptoms (> 30 days) attributed to COVID-19. All reported a viral illness compatible with COVID-19. The patients underwent a multi-modal evaluation, including clinical, psychologic, virologic and specific immunologic assays and were followed longitudinally. A group of 17 convalescent COVID-19 individuals without persistent symptoms were included as a comparison group. RESULTS: The median age was 40 [interquartile range: 35-54] years and 18 (60%) were female. At a median time of 152 [102-164] days after symptom onset, fever, cough and dyspnea were less frequently reported compared with the initial presentation, but paresthesia and burning pain emerged in 18 (60%) and 13 (43%) patients, respectively. The clinical examination was unremarkable in all patients, although the median fatigue and pain visual analog scales were 7 [5-8] and 5 [2-6], respectively. Extensive biologic studies were unremarkable, and multiplex cytokines and ultra-sensitive interferon-α2 measurements were similar between long-haulers and convalescent COVID-19 individuals without persistent symptoms. Using SARS-CoV-2 serology and IFN-γ ELISPOT, we found evidence of a previous SARS-CoV-2 infection in 50% (15/30) of patients, with evidence of a lack of immune response, or a waning immune response, in two patients. Finally, psychiatric evaluation showed that 11 (36.7%), 13 (43.3%) and 9 (30%) patients had a positive screening for anxiety, depression and post-traumatic stress disorder, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Half of patients seeking medical help for post-acute COVID-19 syndrome lack SARS-CoV-2 immunity. The presence of SARS-CoV-2 immunity, or not, had no consequence on the clinical or biologic characteristics of post-acute COVID-19 syndrome patients, all of whom reported severe fatigue, altered quality of life and psychologic distress.

Incidence and predictors of COVID-19 and flares in patients with rare autoimmune diseases: a systematic survey and serological study at a national reference center in France.

BACKGROUND: The risk of severe COVID-19 and its determinants remain largely unknown in patients with autoimmune and inflammatory rheumatic diseases. The objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of COVID-19 infection in patients followed for rare autoimmune diseases as well as the predictors of COVID-19 and disease flare-ups. METHODS: Cross-sectional phone survey from April 9, 2020, to July 2, 2020, during which patients with autoimmune diseases followed at the National Reference Center for Rare Autoimmune diseases of Strasbourg were systematically contacted by phone and sent a prescription for a SARS-CoV-2 serology. RESULTS: One thousand two hundred thirty-two patients were contacted. One thousand fifty-five patients with a confirmed diagnosis of systemic autoimmune disease were included (4 unreachable, 4 moves abroad, 5 deaths before pandemic, 50 without consent, and 114 without autoimmune disease). Among them, 469 (44.5%) patients were tested for SARS-CoV-2 serology. Thirty-nine patients (7.9%) had SARS-CoV-2 infection (either through chest CT-scan [n = 5], RT-PCR on nasopharyngeal swab [n = 14], or serology [n = 31]) among the 496 who underwent at least one of those 3 diagnosis modalities. Of the 39 proven cases, 33 had clinical manifestations (6 asymptomatic patients were diagnosed through systematic serology testing), 31 were managed by home care, 3 were hospitalized due to a need for oxygenation, two required admission to an intensive care unit, and one died. Among patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, reported flares were more frequent than in uninfected patients (26.3% [10/38] vs. 7.0% [32/457], p < 0.0001). Preventive sick leave had no significant impact on the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection (5.8% [3/53]) compared to work continuation (7.6% [30/397], p = 0.64). Overall, the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 was 6.6% (31/469) which was numerically lower to the Grand-Est general population estimated to be 9.0%. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic survey of more than 1000 patients with rare systemic autoimmune diseases reports a low prevalence of proven SARS-CoV-2 infection and very rare severe infections, probably related to good compliance with prophylactic measures in these patients.

Cluster analysis reveals three main patterns of beliefs and intention with respect to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with autoimmune and inflammatory diseases.

INTRODUCTION: Given the COVID-19 pandemic, it is crucial to understand the underlying behavioural determinants of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine hesitancy in patients with autoimmune or inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIIRDs). We aimed to analyse patterns of beliefs and intention regarding SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in AIIRD patients, as a mean of identifying pragmatic actions that could be taken to increase vaccine coverage in this population. METHODS: Data relating to 1258 AIIRD patients were analysed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models, to identify variables associated independently with willingness to get vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2. Subsets of patients showing similar beliefs and intention about SARS-CoV-2 vaccination were characterized using cluster analysis. RESULTS: Hierarchical cluster analysis identified three distinct clusters of AIIRD patients. Three predominant patient attitudes to SARS-COV-2 vaccination were identified: voluntary, hesitant and suspicious. While vaccine willingness differed significantly across the three clusters (P < 0.0001), there was no significant difference regarding fear of getting COVID-19 (P = 0.11), the presence of comorbidities (P = 0.23), the use of glucocorticoids (P = 0.21), or immunocompromised status (P = 0.63). However, patients from cluster #2 (hesitant) and #3 (suspicious) were significantly more concerned about vaccination, the use of a new vaccine technology, lack of long-term data in relation to COVID-19 vaccination, and potential financial links with pharmaceutical companies (P < 0.0001 in all) than patients from cluster #1 (voluntary). DISCUSSION: Importantly, the differences between clusters in terms of patient beliefs and intention was not related to the fear of getting COVID-19 or to any state of frailty, but was related to specific concerns about vaccination. This study may serve as a basis for improved communication and thus help increase COVID-19 vaccine coverage among AIIRD patients.

Rheumatic presentations of Guillain-Barré syndrome as a diagnostic challenge: A case series.

BACKGROUND: Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is an immune-mediated acute polyradiculoneuritis often in post-infectious context. It is a therapeutic emergency as early treatment may prevent disabilities. Pain in GBS has been described extensively, may precede neurological symptoms and bring the patient to rheumatology departments in the first place. OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical presentations and diagnosis of GBS cases referred to rheumatology departments. METHOD: For this retrospective case-series, we screened patients of the rheumatology department (university hospitals of Strasbourg), whose hospitalization records were associated with the ICD-10 Code G61.0 (GBS) from 1993 to 2020. We included patients fulfilling the 1990 NINDS criteria and level one of the Brighton collaboration criteria. We measured the time from symptoms onset to admission and from admission to lumbar puncture as a marker of outpatient and inpatient diagnosis delay, respectively. RESULTS: We describe 8 GBS cases. Six had nociceptive-like prodromal pain: back pain (n=3), peripheral arthralgia (n=1) or diffuse myalgia (n=3). The median time from symptoms onset to admission was 7days [range: 3-60] and the median time from admission to lumbar puncture was 2days [range: 0-8]. Two patients became severely tetraparetic, one requiring intubation. At last follow-up (median: 5.5years; range: 0.5-23years), 4 patients had recovered completely and 4 kept disabilities. CONCLUSIONS: Rheumatic presentations of GBS are rare and diverse. Rheumatologists should be aware of this presentation because early diagnosis and treatment may prevent rapid motor worsening. Rapidly progressive symmetric weakness and areflexia appear as the best clinical diagnosis markers.